Skip to main content

Comrades Editorial · 28 Oct 2026 (PDF)

​
In this edition

  1. Building a Resilient Startup Ecosystem Economic Scenario

​
Economic Scenario

​
Building a Resilient Startup Ecosystem

Source This editorial is based on “Startups would rather stay young forever than grow up into dull, profitable companies” published in The Economic Times on 26/10/2026. The article highlights that venture incentives prioritize continuous market expansion over profitability, creating a culture where startups resist structural maturity and corporate governance to maintain speculative valuations. The modern startup industry frequently prioritizes continuous market expansion and high speculative valuations over achieving traditional profitability and structural maturity. Many startups actively avoid transitioning into traditional enterprises, viewing structured governance as a decline in innovation culture. This reluctance highlights the critical need for corporate governance frameworks, fiscal discipline, and sustainable cash-flow management. Building a resilient ecosystem requires aligning patient capital, deep-tech research, and predictable regulatory compliance. What are the Key Developments in India’s Startup Ecosystem?
  • Expansion of Recognised Startups and Direct Employment Generation:
    • India’s startup ecosystem is expanding in both enterprise numbers and employment, strengthening its contribution to innovation-led economic growth.
    • During 2025–26, DPIIT recognised over 55,200 startups, the highest annual addition since Startup India began.
    • By March 2026, cumulative recognition exceeded 2.23 lakh startups, which had reported more than 23.36 lakh direct jobs. Approximately 4.99 lakh direct jobs were reported as created during 2025–26 alone.
  • Geographical Diversification and Democratisation of Entrepreneurship:
    • Startup activity is spreading beyond established metropolitan hubs, widening opportunities for regional innovation and local problem-solving.
    • A January 2026 government assessment reported that approximately 50% of DPIIT-recognised startups originated in Tier-II and Tier-III cities.
    • State-level expansion is also significant. Uttar Pradesh had over 21,960 recognised startups and Gujarat over 19,270 by March 2026.
    • These developments broaden the entrepreneurial base across different markets and production systems.
  • Recovery in Venture Investment and Expansion of Patient-Capital Support:
    • Funding is showing renewed momentum alongside a stronger institutional framework for financing research-intensive businesses.
    • The Bain–IVCA India Venture Capital Report 2026 estimated that Venture Capital (VC) and growth-equity investment reached approximately USD 16 billion in calendar year 2025, marking a second consecutive year of growth.
    • Complementing private investment, the government issued operational guidelines for the ₹10,000 crore Startup India Fund of Funds 2.0 in April 2026.
  • Recognition Framework Adapted to Deep Tech and Cooperative Innovation:
    • A major February 2026 regulatory revision increased the general startup-recognition turnover threshold from ₹100 crore to ₹200 crore and introduced a dedicated Deep Tech Startup category.
    • Eligible deep-tech entities can receive recognition for up to 20 years, with a turnover threshold of ₹300 crore, acknowledging their longer development cycles and intensive research requirements.
    • The framework also extended eligibility to qualifying state-registered and multi-state cooperative societies.
    • This broadens the policy architecture to accommodate both frontier-technology ventures and community-based innovation, subject to fulfilment of the other recognition criteria.
  • Emergence of Indigenous AI Models and Enterprise-Focused Innovation:
    • Indian startups are increasingly developing foundational technologies, multilingual AI and specialised enterprise applications.
    • Under the IndiaAI Mission, the government reported in July 2026 that 20 indigenous sovereign-model proposals, comprising 12 large language models and 8 small language models, had been identified for support across startups and institutions.
    • Examples include Sarvam AI’s models and Gnani.AI’s speech-to-speech technology.
  • Commercialisation of Space Technology and Wider Private Participation:
    • Space entrepreneurship is developing across launch systems, satellites, propulsion, Earth observation and orbital services, supported by access to public technical infrastructure.
    • An August 2026 parliamentary reply reported approximately 440 registered space-technology startups, with 18 startups among the entities authorised by IN-SPACe.
    • Examples include Agnikul Cosmos, Skyroot Aerospace, Pixxel, Bellatrix Aerospace and Dhruva Space.
    • The support architecture includes testing facilities, technology transfer, seed funding, a ₹1,000 crore venture-capital fund and a ₹500 crore Technology Adoption Fund.
  • Deepening Biotechnology Entrepreneurship and the Lab-to-Market Pipeline:
    • Biotechnology is becoming an increasingly substantial component of India’s startup landscape, extending entrepreneurship into diagnostics, therapeutics, agricultural biotechnology and industrial bioprocessing.
    • The BIRAC India Bioeconomy Report 2026 recorded 11,855 registered biotech startups in 2025, compared with 10,075 in 2024, an addition of 1,780 enterprises.
    • This growing pipeline reflects the importance of research institutions, specialised incubators and industry collaboration in commercialising scientific knowledge.
  • Stronger Public-Procurement Access and Intellectual-Property Generation:
    • Startups are gaining larger institutional markets while expanding their innovation and intellectual-property portfolios.
    • During 2025–26, government buyers placed over 1.40 lakh orders worth ₹19,190 crore with startups through GeM, compared with approximately ₹14,103 crore in 2024–25.
    • Meanwhile, startups filed over 4,480 patent applications in 2025–26, up from more than 2,850 in the preceding year.
What are the Key Challenges Associated with India’s Startup Ecosystem?
  • Uneven Funding Availability and Vulnerability to Refinancing Shocks:
    • Startups face difficulties securing capital consistently across their development cycle, particularly when investors become selective about follow-on funding.
    • Tracxn’s India Tech FY2025–26 report recorded a 15% decline in seed funding to USD 1.3 billion and a 38% decline in late-stage funding to $5.6 billion.
    • These stage-specific contractions can shorten cash runways, force dilution or delay expansion.
  • Weak Unit Economics and the Difficulty of Converting Scale into Profitability:
    • Rapid customer acquisition and transaction growth do not automatically generate sustainable earnings when discounts, fulfilment infrastructure and delivery costs remain high.
    • For example, Swiggy’s Instamart recorded gross order value of ₹7,881 crore in January–March 2026, growing 68.8% year-on-year, but reported an adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) loss of ₹858 crore for that quarter.
    • Smaller competitors with limited capital reserves face particular difficulty sustaining similar expansion strategies.
  • Governance Failures and Inadequate Oversight of Related-Party Transactions:
    • Founder dominance, weak internal controls and insufficient scrutiny of fund utilisation can expose investors, employees and lenders to losses.
    • SEBI’s July 2025 confirmatory order concerning Gensol, which also examined BluSmart-linked transactions, discussed prima facie concerns about diversion of EV-financing funds.
      • It recorded that ₹262.13 crore remained unaccounted for in the examination underlying its interim order.
    • Such cases demonstrate why credible audits, independent oversight and transparent related-party disclosures matter across interconnected entrepreneurial businesses.
  • Weak Lab-to-Market Translation and Expensive Validation Infrastructure:
    • Research-intensive startups must bridge the “valley of death” between a promising laboratory result and a product that customers can reliably purchase and deploy.
    • A February 2026 parliamentary reply identified inadequate specialised testing and validation facilities, high infrastructure requirements and technology-market risks among deep-tech constraints.
    • Illustratively, the ANRF Translational Research and Innovation initiative targets advancement from Technology Readiness Level 4 to Level 7.
      • This highlights the substantial work between laboratory validation and operational demonstration.
  • Concentration of Capital and Unequal Access to Entrepreneurial Opportunity:
    • Wider startup recognition has not eliminated disparities in financing.
    • Tracxn reported that Bengaluru attracted 33% and Mumbai 21% of Indian tech funding in 2025–26.
    • Gender-related differences also warrant attention. Under Credit Guarantee Scheme for Startups (CGSS), only around ₹39 crore of ₹925 crore in guaranteed loans went to women-led startups by January 2026.
  • Shortage of Specialised Talent and Constraints on Execution:
    • Startups need research, engineering and commercialisation capabilities that are not interchangeable with general technology qualifications.
    • In Tracxn’s survey of approximately 30 India-focused VC investors, 39% identified talent shortages and skill gaps as a concern for 2026.
    • It highlights the execution challenge of assembling teams capable of moving from product development to dependable commercial delivery.
  • Concentrated Exit Channels and Dependence on Public-Market Conditions:
    • Investors need credible routes to realise returns and recycle capital into new ventures, but exit opportunities remain uneven across sectors and company sizes.
    • The Bain–IVCA India Venture Capital Report 2026 found that public-market exits accounted for over 65% of exit value in 2025, while consumer technology and fintech together contributed more than 60% of total exit value.
    • Although exit activity was resilient, this concentration creates exposure to stock-market cycles.
How can India Build a More Resilient Startup Ecosystem?
  • Expand Patient Capital through Milestone-Based and Blended Financing:
    • India should align financing instruments with startups’ development stages, e.g., grants for proof-of-concept, patient equity for commercialisation and appropriately structured debt for expansion.
    • Public funding should attract private co-investment, with subsequent releases linked to independently verified technical milestones.
    • A recent example is Technology Development Board (TDB)’s October 2026 agreement to provide ₹116 crore to Manastu Space through Optionally Convertible Debt under the RDI Fund.
    • This approach can support capital-intensive innovation without forcing premature commercial returns.
  • Shared Commercialisation Infrastructure and Clear Intellectual-Property Pathways:
    • Establish regional prototyping, testing and certification facilities that startups can access through subsidised innovation vouchers, reducing the cost of owning specialised equipment.
    • Universities should strengthen Technology Transfer Offices, adopt standard licensing agreements and clarify ownership and revenue-sharing arrangements before undertaking jointly funded research.
    • Incubators should consequently be evaluated through validated products, licensing agreements and commercial deployments, alongside the number of enterprises they admit.
  • Convert Government Procurement into a Transparent First-Customer Mechanism:
    • Ministries, states and public enterprises should publish problem statements and competitively fund small, paid pilots, followed by larger procurement only after independent validation.
    • Implement applicable startup relaxations concerning prior turnover, experience and earnest-money deposits, while retaining technical and quality requirements.
    • An interoperable registry of successfully evaluated solutions could help departments identify relevant products, reducing repeated demonstrations and improving startups’ access to credible commercial references.
  • Institutionalise Proportionate Governance and Financial Discipline:
    • Introduce a stage-based governance framework, drawing on the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) Corporate Governance Charter and Startup Governance Scorecard.
    • Early-stage firms should maintain accurate accounts, ownership records and conflict-of-interest disclosures; larger ventures should develop stronger board oversight, audit controls and scrutiny of related-party transactions.
    • Investors and public funding agencies should assess cash runway, customer retention, contribution margins and fund utilisation, using metrics appropriate to the business stage.
  • Create Coordinated Regulatory Sandboxes and Predictable Compliance Pathways:
    • Develop sector-specific sandboxes for emerging technologies, with defined testing periods, consumer safeguards, evaluation criteria and a clear route to full authorisation.
    • A startup operating across multiple sectors should receive coordinated guidance from the relevant regulators through a designated lead authority.
    • Introduce reusable documentation, published clarification databases and advance consultation on material regulatory changes. This would reduce uncertainty while preserving substantive requirements concerning safety, privacy, financial integrity and consumer protection.
  • Develop Inclusive Regional Ecosystems with Outcome-Based Support:
    • State governments should build specialised startup clusters around local universities, industrial capabilities and market demand, rather than distributing identical incubation facilities everywhere.
    • Support founders in smaller cities, women-led ventures and underserved communities through proof-of-concept grants, investor-readiness programmes and competitively managed co-investment facilities.
    • Use BHASKAR for discoverability and MAARG for access to relevant mentors, supplemented by assisted, local-language support.
  • Strengthen Researcher Mobility, Industry Skills and Talent Retention:
    • Enable joint appointments, entrepreneurial sabbaticals and structured secondments between universities, public laboratories and startups, with transparent rules on intellectual property and conflicts of interest.
    • Pair technical training with paid apprenticeships in product engineering, regulatory validation, manufacturing and commercial operations.
    • NITI Aayog’s 2026 R&D reform report recommends researcher-mobility frameworks for deep-tech employees.
  • Support Global Market Access and Diversified Routes to Scale:
    • Strengthen Startup India’s International Bridges through destination-specific support for product certification, overseas patent protection, distribution partnerships and customer acquisition. Its existing global-collaboration network provides a foundation for more measurable commercial outcomes.
    • At home, encourage transparent corporate–startup co-development, technology licensing, strategic acquisitions and secondary transactions, giving viable ventures alternatives to dependence on IPOs.
Conclusion
  • India’s startup ecosystem must transition from valuation-driven expansion towards sustainable, innovation-led enterprise creation. A balanced approach combining patient capital, sound corporate governance, research commercialisation and predictable regulation can strengthen long-term viability. Equally important are decentralised entrepreneurial opportunities, skilled talent and diversified exit pathways. By aligning public support with measurable outcomes and financial discipline, India can transform its startup ecosystem into a globally competitive engine of employment, technological self-reliance and inclusive economic growth.