Skip to main content

Comrades Editorial · 17 Sep 2026 (PDF)


In this edition

  1. Reforming Plastic Waste Management in India Environment & Ecology

Environment & Ecology

Reforming Plastic Waste Management in India

Source This editorial is based on “Plastic regime needs transparency” published in the Business Standard on 13/09/2026. The article highlights that despite millions of reported recycling tonnes, EPR frameworks suffer from fake certificates, data gaps, and rampant pollution, demanding stringent verification, transparency, and design-stage circularity reforms. Despite India’s Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework reporting 20.7 million tonnes of recycled plastic since 2022, 5 times official generation, widespread environmental leakage persists. This mismatch highlights deep flaws in data integrity, transparency, and regulatory enforcement. Trading recycling certificates merely proves compliance, not actual waste diversion. India’s crisis demands a shift from paper-based accounting to tackling product design, source reduction, and verifying real environmental impact. What is the Key Regulatory Framework for Plastic-Waste Management in India?
  • Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016:
    • The PWM Rules, 2016, replacing the 2011 rules, regulate plastic waste across its entire chain—from manufacture and consumption to collection, recycling and disposal.
    • Their coverage was extended beyond municipal areas to rural regions, making Gram Panchayats important implementing institutions.
    • Waste generators must segregate plastic at source, avoid littering and hand it over to authorised collection agencies. The rules embody source segregation, channelisation, shared responsibility and environmentally sound processing.
    • Plastic Waste Management Rules has been amended several times, most recent being the 2026 one that has shifted regulation from post-consumer collection towards design-stage circularity.
      • Plastic Waste Management (Amendment) Rules, 2026:
        • For Category-I rigid packaging, mandatory recycled content progressively increases from 30% in 2025–26 to 60% from 2028–29; Category-II rises from 10% to 20%, and Category-III from 5% to 10%.
        • Exemptions apply where recycled content is restricted by regulators such as FSSAI, CDSCO or the Central Insecticides Board, balancing circularity with food, drug and pesticide safety.
  • Guidelines on Extended Producer Responsibility for Plastic Packaging, 2022:
    • Schedule II of the rules operationalises EPR for Producers, Importers and Brand Owners (PIBOs).
    • Plastic packaging is classified into rigid plastic, flexible plastic, multi-layered packaging and compostable plastic packaging, with category-specific recycling obligations.
    • PIBOs must register on the CPCB portal, declare packaging placed in the market, fulfil recycling/reuse targets and purchase verified EPR certificates from registered Plastic Waste Processors.
  • Food Safety and Standards (Packaging) Regulations, 2018 and 2025 Amendment:
    • Plastic used for food contact is additionally regulated by the FSSAI to prevent chemical migration and microplastic-related health risks.
    • The 2025 amendment permits appropriately processed recycled PET (rPET) for food packaging, subject to approved recycling technology, food-grade standards and traceability.
    • Plastic packaging must comply with overall and specific migration limits, Good Manufacturing Practices and prescribed Indian Standards.
  • Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016:
    • These rules regulate transboundary movement of contaminated plastic scrap and implement India’s obligations under the Basel Convention.
    • India prohibited the import of solid plastic waste in 2019 to prevent the country from becoming a dumping destination for foreign plastic.
    • Ports and Customs authorities can order re-export of illegally imported consignments under the Customs Act and port laws.
  • Environment (Protection) Act, 1986:
    • Plastic-waste regulation derives statutory authority from the Environment (Protection) Act (EPA), 1986, empowering the Union Government to prescribe environmental standards and regulate polluting activities.
    • Violations can attract environmental compensation under the Polluter Pays Principle (Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996)), closure directions and administrative penalties.
    • The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 provides an additional forum for enforcing environmental compliance and seeking restoration.
What are the Key Innovations in Plastic-Waste Management in India?
  • Advanced Chemical Recycling and Plastic-to-Chemical Conversion:
    • Pyrolysis and depolymerisation can recover hydrocarbons from contaminated, multilayered and low-value plastics that are difficult to recycle mechanically.
    • Navi Mumbai-based APChemi’s PUREMAX technology purifies plastic-pyrolysis oil into refinery-grade feedstock for producing new polymers and chemicals, enabling plastic-to-plastic circularity, rather than merely burning waste as fuel.
  • AI-, Robotics- and Sensor-Based Waste Sorting:
    • Indian innovators are replacing hazardous manual sorting with computer vision, machine learning, robotic arms and near-infrared sensors.
    • Ahmedabad-based Ishitva Robotic Systems has developed AI-enabled sorting systems that identify and separate plastics according to polymer type, colour and commercial value, improving the purity of recovered material.
  • Digital Material Traceability and Deposit-Return Systems:
    • Platforms are using QR codes, mobile applications, geotagging and digital payments to connect consumers, waste collectors, recyclers and producers.
    • Recykal’s Digital Deposit Refund System, piloted in tourist destinations such as Uttarakhand, assigns deposits to beverage containers and refunds consumers upon verified return; one implementation reportedly recovered approximately 1.63 lakh plastic bottles.
    • Banyan Nation’s data-intelligence platform traces plastic from collection to recycling.
  • High-Quality “Bottle-to-Bottle” and Packaging-to-Packaging Recycling:
    • Innovation is shifting recycling from low-value products to food-grade rPET and premium recycled HDPE, preserving material value across multiple cycles.
    • Modern plants employ hot washing, flake purification, colour sorting, decontamination and solid-state polymerisation to convert discarded PET bottles into resin suitable for new packaging.
    • Banyan Nation has placed more than 3 billion bottles made with responsibly recycled plastic on the market, illustrating the movement from downcycling to closed-loop recycling.
  • Plastic Waste in Roads and Geosynthetic Infrastructure:
    • India is expanding beyond conventional plastic-modified bitumen towards plastic geocells, composite aggregates and structural applications.
    • In 2025, CSIR–Central Road Research Institute, BPCL and NHAI constructed a trial section on the DND–Faridabad–KMP Expressway using about 30 tonnes of end-of-life plastic in geocells placed within the road sub-base.
    • The technology can utilise multilayered packaging, which is normally unsuitable for standard plastic-road applications, while geocells improve load distribution and reduce demand for natural aggregates.
  • Bio-Based and Agricultural-Residue Packaging:
    • Start-ups and research institutions are developing alternatives from paddy straw, bagasse, seaweed, rice bran, banana fibre and areca leaves.
    • The India Plastic Challenge–Hackathon supported innovations such as paddy-straw-based biodegradable thermocol substitutes and seaweed-derived packaging, simultaneously addressing plastic pollution and crop-residue burning.
    • More than 150 manufacturers displayed eco-alternatives at the government’s National Expo, demonstrating the growing commercial ecosystem around compostable materials.
  • River and Marine-Plastic Interception:
    • Innovation is increasingly targeting plastic before it fragments into microplastics or enters the ocean.
    • The Ocean Cleanup’s Mumbai programme, announced in 2026, combines river mapping, data-driven pollution-source identification and interception systems to capture floating waste before it reaches the Arabian Sea.
    • Emerging systems use floating booms, conveyor-based collectors, solar-powered interceptors and GPS-enabled waste mapping, linking recovered material to local sorting and recycling facilities.
  • Waste-Picker Cooperatives and Inclusive Circular Enterprises:
    • India’s major institutional innovation is integrating informal waste workers as professional environmental-service providers, rather than treating them as beneficiaries.
    • Through an agreement with Pune Municipal Corporation, the women-led SWaCH cooperative has involved over 3,000 waste pickers, served more than 6 lakh households and recovered approximately 50,000 tonnes of recyclable material annually.
    • Its user-fee model combines door-to-door collection, source segregation, occupational identity, decentralised recovery and livelihood security, while retaining workers’ ownership of recyclables.
What are the Key Concerns Associated with Plastic-Waste Management in India?
  • Rapid Waste Growth and an Unreliable Data Baseline:
    • Plastic consumption is rising faster than collection and processing capacity, while inconsistent reporting obscures the actual scale of the problem.
    • According to data provided by State Pollution Control Boards and Pollution Control Committees to CPCB, the total plastic waste generated in India in 2022-23 was 4.13 million tonnes.
    • However, different official and research estimates range from about 4–9 million tonnes annually, reflecting missing data on rural waste, littering and informal recycling.
    • Such data fragmentation prevents municipalities from accurately planning collection vehicles, Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs), recycling capacity and landfill space.
  • Poor Source Segregation and Contaminated Recyclables:
    • Plastic mixed with food, sanitary waste, soil or hazardous material loses its recycling value and is frequently diverted to landfills, cement kilns or open dumps.
    • E.g., in Ernakulam district, 89% of the 8,941 tonnes of non-biodegradable waste collected in 2025 was classified as reject waste, largely because milk pouches, carry bags and other plastics were unwashed or mixed with wet waste.
    • Consequently, municipal systems may achieve high collection without meaningful material recovery.
  • Low Recyclability of Multilayered and Flexible Packaging:
    • Sachets, laminated pouches and thin films combine different polymers, aluminium and adhesives, making physical separation technically difficult and economically unviable.
    • Unlike PET bottles and rigid HDPE containers, such multilayered plastic (MLP) has little resale value; therefore, waste pickers often leave it uncollected, causing selective recycling based on market value rather than environmental harm.
    • Its diversion to cement kilns or waste-to-energy facilities constitutes end-of-life disposal, not genuine closed-loop recycling.
  • Weak EPR Verification and “Paper Compliance”:
    • The EPR system risks becoming a certificate-purchasing mechanism unless physical waste flows correspond with digital recycling credits.
    • Investigations involving CPCB and State Boards reportedly identified nearly 7 lakh questionable or fake EPR certificates, some generated far beyond the processing capacity of recyclers; cumulative penalties of around ₹355 crore were imposed.
    • Moreover, EPR focuses principally on packaging placed by registered enterprises, leaving many small and informal producers outside effective monitoring.
  • Municipal Capacity and Fiscal Deficits:
    • Urban Local Bodies bear collection and enforcement responsibilities but frequently lack technical personnel, stable user charges, land and processing infrastructure.
    • A recent CAG audit of Punjab’s urban bodies found that although 4,207 of 4,222 tonnes of municipal waste generated daily in 2021–22 was collected, only 35% was treated; user-charge collection was merely 0.52% of the projected amount.
    • Small towns and gram panchayats face an even larger last-mile logistics gap, because transporting low-density plastic often costs more than its market value.
  • Marginalisation and Occupational Risks of Waste Pickers:
    • Waste pickers manually handle contaminated plastics without adequate gloves, masks, healthcare, social security or occupational recognition, exposing them to sharp objects, pathogens, toxic smoke and musculoskeletal injuries.
    • Mechanised collection or exclusive private contracts can dispossess them of valuable recyclables, while producers receive EPR credit for material recovered through their underpaid labour.
    • This creates an environmental-justice paradox: those delivering recycling services bear the greatest health risks but receive the smallest share of circular-economy value.
  • Open Burning, Toxic Emissions and False Circularity:
    • Uncollected or low-value plastic is frequently burned in streets, dumpsites and household fires to reduce waste volume.
    • Burning PVC and additive-rich plastics can release dioxins, furans, particulate matter and hydrogen chloride, aggravating respiratory illness and local air pollution.
    • Even controlled incineration and cement-kiln co-processing convert fossil-derived plastic carbon into greenhouse-gas emissions and may discourage reduction, reuse and mechanical recycling if counted as equivalent recovery.
    • Poorly regulated plastic-to-fuel plants may also generate contaminated oil, char and wastewater. Instead of solving pollution, they just move it from the air to water and land.
  • Microplastic Leakage into Water, Food and Ecosystems:
    • Plastic management remains focused on visible litter, while fragmented particles from packaging, synthetic textiles, tyres and personal-care products largely escape monitoring.
    • An ICMR-linked study of Bhopal’s sewage-treatment facilities reportedly found 10–15 microplastic particles per litre even after treatment and 7–9 particles per gram of sludge, showing that conventional plants are not designed for microscopic plastic removal.
    • Microplastics can enter agricultural soil through sewage sludge, reach lakes and rivers through treated effluent and accumulate in fish and other food chains. Their ability to carry plasticisers, heavy metals and persistent pollutants creates an emerging public-health concern.
What Measures are Required to Tackle Plastic-Waste Pollution in India?
  • Adopt Binding Virgin-Plastic Reduction and Reuse Targets:
    • Large retailers and brands should be required to offer refill stations, reusable transport packaging, returnable containers and packaging-free product options, supported by standardised container dimensions and shared washing infrastructure.
    • A gradually increasing virgin-plastic levy can narrow the price gap between cheap virgin resin and recycled material, while exemptions may protect essential medical and food-safety applications.
    • UNEP estimates that scaling reuse systems, including refillable bottles and packaging take-back, could reduce plastic pollution by 30% by 2040.
  • Introduce Eco-Modulated EPR Fees:
    • Instead of imposing similar obligations on all packaging, India should make the EPR fee proportional to recyclability and environmental damage.
    • Producers using mono-material, reusable or high-recycled-content packaging should pay lower fees, while multilayered sachets, dark-coloured plastics, toxic additives and non-recyclable composites should attract a disruption premium.
    • South Korea offers up to a 50% fee reduction for packaging with better recyclability ratings, demonstrating how eco-modulation can shift product design upstream.
  • Mandate Design-for-Circularity and Chemical Transparency:
    • Packaging should be evaluated before market entry through a recyclability passport covering polymer composition, adhesives, inks, additives and compatibility with Indian recycling facilities.
    • Producers must disclose hazardous additives such as certain plasticisers, flame retardants and heavy-metal pigments so that contaminated plastics do not re-enter toys, food containers or household products.
    • A “recyclable in practice and at scale” test would prevent greenwashing through technically recyclable products for which no collection or processing infrastructure exists.
  • Build a Tamper-Proof EPR Verification Architecture:
    • The CPCB portal should verify actual material movement instead of relying mainly on invoices and self-declared recycling certificates.
    • EPR transactions should be integrated with GST invoices, e-way bills, geo-tagged collection records, electricity consumption and calibrated weighbridges to compare claimed processing against a facility’s physical capacity.
    • Independent third-party audits, random material sampling and public dashboards should create end-to-end traceability, while deliberate generation of ghost credits should attract blacklisting and personal liability for responsible officers.
  • Establish Regional Circularity Hubs for Small Towns and Rural Areas:
    • Individual local bodies often cannot sustain specialised recycling plants; therefore, districts should create hub-and-spoke plastic recovery networks.
    • Panchayat-level aggregation and baling centres can supply district-level facilities for sorting, washing and recycling, supported by shared logistics for low-density plastics.
    • EPR funds should reimburse municipalities through a per-tonne service fee adjusted for distance, terrain and plastic category, rather than leaving collection costs to general sanitation budgets.
  • Guarantee a Just Transition for Waste Pickers:
    • Informal workers should become recognised partners within municipal and EPR systems through occupational identity cards, cooperatives and service contracts.
    • Producers should pay a transparent collection and sorting service charge, separate from the scrap price, because low-value plastic collection provides an environmental service even when the material has little resale value.
    • The World Bank identifies the integration of informal collectors as essential to effective plastic-packaging EPR, making social inclusion and responsible sourcing central to circularity.
  • Develop a National Microplastics Prevention Programme:
    • Policy must address invisible emissions from synthetic textiles, tyres, paints, cosmetics and plastic fragmentation, rather than focusing only on visible litter.
    • India should establish harmonised testing standards and a national monitoring network covering drinking water, food, air, sewage, sludge, rivers and coastal sediments.
    • Measures should include microfibre filters in industrial laundries, abrasion standards for tyres, restrictions on intentionally added microplastics and tertiary filtration at sewage-treatment plants near sensitive wetlands, building upon Global Plastics Treaty.
      • The Global Plastics Treaty is a proposed international legally binding agreement initiated by the United Nations Environment Assembly in March 2022 to end plastic pollution across the entire lifecycle of plastics.
Conclusion
  • India’s Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework must shift from a paper-based certificate trading system to a true circular economy. While conceptually sound, its credibility is undermined by ghost credits and unverified tracking. True environmental integrity requires going beyond certificate counts to enforce source reduction, eliminate unrecyclable packaging, improve data transparency, and integrate informal waste workers. Ultimately, success must be measured by a genuine reduction in virgin plastic consumption and environmental leakage, rather than traded compliance credits.